Showing posts with label dyslexia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dyslexia. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 November 2014

Writing for Reluctant Readers #scbwicon

Janet Foxley



Following the excellent interviews with Mairi Kidd of Barrington Stoke and Barrington Stoke Author, Anthony McGowan, Janet Foxley gives us an overview of SCBWI British Isles Conference 2014’s Craft Intensive on Writing for Reluctant Readers.





It was all about High and Low. The High of getting one’s first book contract or the Low of receiving one’s hundredth rejection? No, this was about writing High/Low books: high interest level, low reading age.

Mairi is Anthony’s editor at Barrington Stoke, publisher of ‘dyslexia friendly’ books for young (and older) people who, for a variety of reasons, find reading difficult.

Barrington Stoke have designed their own font, with serifs, longer ascenders and descenders and subtly different shapes to some of the letters.

She started off by telling us about the appearance of their books. The text is easy on the eye, printed on a cream rather than a white background. (It’s not cream paper, by the way, but white paper printed with cream ink – I bet you didn’t know that.) The paper is thick, so the eye/brain can’t be confused by print showing through from the other side. They also leave more space between letters, words, sentences and paragraphs than normal typesetting. And they have designed their own font, with serifs, longer ascenders and descenders and subtly different shapes to some of the letters. It looks like this:

From The Fall by Anthony McGowan, Barrington Stoke, 2011.
A scan of Janet's own copy of Anthony's book
Click to enlarge

With the printing now made easier to read, it’s over to the writer and editor to make the stories easier to read. Mairi suggested that authors should write the first draft in their normal style and address the low reading age at the revision stage.

Children who have never been read to have no experience of running a narrative in their heads.

Some of what is required is the same as for any commercial fiction: a strong opening hook, a sympathetic protagonist, plenty of cliff-hangers. Then one must consider the struggling reader’s specific needs – short sentences, short paragraphs and if possible no words with difficult spellings that can trip them up: ‘-ough’ words, for instance. Concrete nouns are easier to understand than abstract nouns.

Children who have never been read to have no experience of running a narrative in their heads. The writer must help these readers by following a simple linear structure. A single point of view is best and description should be kept to a minimum as it distracts from the narrative. Care must be taken not to lose the reader’s interest by referring to things that fall outside their frame of reference.

The word order must be like natural speech, not literary language. 

The writing itself must be clear, with no room for confusion or ambiguity, no unreliable narrators, no word play, no clues which the reader would need to remember in order to understand what happens later on.

The word order must be like natural speech, not literary language. Dialogue should be tagged with the speaker more often than usual, using names rather than pronouns so that the reader doesn’t have to wonder which ‘he’ or ‘she’ is speaking. If the narrative is in the first person, the reader must be made aware of the narrator’s name early on. And double rather than single quotation marks should be used, as they give the reader a bigger signal that they’re dealing with speech.

Finally there should be a clear, satisfying and preferably upbeat conclusion – no open endings where readers could feel they have missed or misunderstood something.

You might think all these constraints would lead to stilted writing. They don’t. See for yourself – read Anthony’s The Fall, or Brock. Or both. It won’t take you long – Barrington Stoke books are short. Mairi gave us this table:

Click to enlarge.


 One writer I know said she knew she’d ‘arrived’ when she was asked to write for Barrington Stoke.

Someone then asked how to go about submitting their work. The answer was ‘you can’t’. Barrington Stoke invite only well-established authors to write for them. They aim to give their readers the same authors and the same quality of writing as non-struggling readers enjoy. One writer I know said she knew she’d ‘arrived’ when she was asked to write for Barrington Stoke.

“Tim said” is preferred to “said Tim”

The news that they’re not open to submissions may have been why a few delegates didn’t return for the afternoon session, in which we were given a bit of practice at high/low writing. We had to write a short passage and pass it to someone else for appropriate editing. Then Mairi and Tony came round to assess our efforts. “Tim said” is preferred to “said Tim”, apparently.

Many thanks are due to Mairi and Tony for this thoroughly interesting insight into a specialist arm of publishing. I was fascinated by the whole process of creating a Barrington Stoke book. As a writer, I felt that a lot of what I’d learned could usefully be applied to my writing of Early Readers and chapter books. And as the mother of a severely dyslexic son, I couldn’t help wishing that Barrington Stoke had been around when he was young.



Janet Foxley was nearly put off books for life by a degree wading through German and French classics. She always preferred writing books to analysing them, and she started writing children’s stories when her own children were small. There was little help available for aspiring authors at that time and it took her 35 years to find a publisher. Then, ‘overnight success’, Muncle Trogg sold to 24 countries and was optioned for an animated film. Janet has since written two more books about Muncle, the third currently published only in Germany. She joined SCBWI in 2007.

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Writing with Dyslexia

By Sally Poyton 


To start I’m going to share some of my all-time best spelling faux pas… 

This week one of my characters stepped out of the SH!T – (this should have been ship) whilst another ‘dialectally’ cut his food. Another went to borrow a book and had a conversation with a Libyan who was printing something off on her brothel printer. 

After all this I needed to have a drink so I headed to the nearest bra. 

Writing with dyslexia has it perils, most of them not too bad although in a recent submission (which I’d checked and re-checked), I noticed after I’d pressed send that the second word was spelt wrong; I’d spelt Witch with a B at the front (it was a 6-9 comedy). Needless to say I didn’t hear back! 

Yes, writing is a mine-field for a dyslexic like me, but still if you love it enough you press ahead. The first feedback I ever got when I completed my first novel was from a friend who also happened to be an editor, she said…

 “The concept seems sound, but it’s totally unreadable. It took me three hours to read the first page.” 

I'm dyslexic, but I'm also an optimist so I focus on the positive.

I’m dyslexic, but I’m also an optimist so I ignored the latter and focused on the positive, thinking that despite spelling defying me and finding grammar aloof, I’d solider on. My friend kindly took it upon herself to educate me in the ways of grammar, which has helped the readability of my writing infinitely, however spelling is a total other ballgame so I had to find coping mechanisms and here are a few of them… 

Spell checker - it is one of the things I rely on although it is by no way dyslexia proof. Here are a few tips I learnt about getting the best out of spell check. 


1. On a fairly regular basis it breaks, it actually has a strop about the sheer quantity of errors and shuts itself off. IGNORE THIS AT YOUR PERIL, AS IT’LL STOP HIGHLIGHTING AND PICKING UP ERRORS - this is not something you want to discover at the end of an 80,000 document believe me. 




2. If you are writing dialogue or have lots of your own made up words, create a custom dictionary. CAUTION – get someone you trust to check that you’ve spelt it correctly before you add it – otherwise you’re allowing misspelling to go unchecked. 

3. If spell check can’t recognise what you’re trying to spell, copy and paste it into the GOOGLE search bar, this will usually bring it up first time. It's because google has on file the list of what everyone searches for including the misspelling and what they click on, so they have a great wealth of experience with a bad speller. This usually gets you the correct word. 


General Tips 

  • I have a grammar cheat sheet which I refer to that’s hung up by the PC which is a quick reference to; which which is which, and which their, there, they’re to use. 
  • I write all my tweets in word and then copy and paste them into twitter to ensure my spelling is correct. 
  • Whilst blogging – I write in word and check, then paste in blogger and check, then read through once it’s published as seeing it on the actual platform makes it easier to spot mistakes, then I edit to correct them. Then I promote the blog. It’s time consuming but it’s worth it! 
  • I work visually like many dyslexics, so I use sketchpads and notice boards to keep my notes and character info etc, so it's easy to see what they look like and remember where all the information is. 


    Let yourself be free - get the story out then convert it into something readable.

    Most important tip! 

    Don’t worry about any of it - spelling, grammar, in the first draft – get it done, get it written and then edit. If you worry about it you’ll be in danger that it’ll stifle your creativity, you’ll get writers' block and give up. Let yourself be free, get the story out and then convert it into readable English when you edit! 





    Remember…  

    Some of the most famous authors ever are dyslexic, if they can do it so can you… 





    Sally Poyton organises The London Professional Series with David Richardson. She writes mostly YA Fantasy. Up until 2011 it was a secret pursuit, but now Sally's come out of the writing closest. She's dyslexic, so writing is not without its difficulties but she LOVES it. Sally is also an author on Space on the Bookshelf, a blog that celebrates children's literature with reviews, views and more.

    Sunday, 21 April 2013

    Ask A Publisher - Q&A with Sara O'Connor, Editorial Director at Hot Key Books

    Are you an aspiring writer wanting to increase your chances of publication? Or a published author who wants to maximise their marketing strategy?

    In this monthly column, Sara O'Connor, Editorial Director, Print and Digital at Hot Key Books answers your burning publishing questions.




    Given Sally Gardner's success and dyslexia awareness and acceptance being so much greater, are publishers doing to anything to enable dyslexic readers?

    I can’t speak for other publishers, but it is most definitely something that is in our minds much more than it was before. But I think we could definitely do more. I would love to hear your suggestions! Feel free to post in the comments below.

    Do publishers look less favourably on manuscripts that the author submits directly (i.e. without an agent)? Have you ever taken anyone on via this submission method?

    Most publishers don’t accept unagented submissions. Those that do are deliberately looking to give unagented writers a chance. So, I would say that publishers that will accept unagented would look just as favourably on unagented. Hot Key does accept unagented manuscripts and have acquired books directly from authors, but not quite from the “slushpile”. Usually we find our unagented authors through competitions (like Undiscovered Voices which just launched!).

    If a publisher rejects your manuscript but says nice things about it, is it okay to resubmit after a rewrite?

    I expect this isn’t what you want to hear, but I would strongly advise against it. The best way to take advantage of that positive feedback to is send something new, and even MORE fantastic. I know that for me, if I wanted that book with improvements, I would have asked to work with you on it. I really recommend that you DON’T revise something that is out or has been out on submission, but instead write something new. That way you have DOUBLED your chances of getting a deal – you’ll have two books to send around instead of just one (as long as the second book is NOT a sequel to the first). And if each time you send something out on submission you start something new, your chances of finding the right thing at the right time with the right person will exponentially increase.

    "I really recommend that you DON’T revise something that is out or has been out on submission, but instead write something new."

    What have been the biggest turn-offs for you in a submission?

    My biggest turn-off is too much world building and back story in the opening chapter(s). I want to be in the present of the story (not present tense, just in the action of the story) from the outset, with the details of where I am and where the characters have come from built into that forward-moving action. Smaller turn offs: characters having an argument in order to get out lots of information or characters that are “bored” and so stumble into adventure.

    What's your take on swearing in YA? How far can you go in the name of realism?

    Publishers and editors will have different feelings about this, and it does depend on the book. I would say that the best swearing is the kind you don’t notice. If the situation calls for swearing and it doesn’t stand out or feel gratuitous, then swear. But know that it will have an effect on certain sales, especially in the education sector. There are a few instances of the f word in Maggot Moon, and we did think about it – but they are used sparingly and in situations when it makes sense. They have integrity, and that’s how I would recommend you do it.

    "My biggest turn-off is too much world building and back story in the opening chapter(s)."


    Do publishers have favourite agents? When you're shopping for an agent, should you be looking at which publishers seem to favour which agents?

    Yes – editors do have favourite agents. Just like it is a personal connection to your book, there are personal relationships between editors and agents that get on well or have similar tastes. But you may have a hard time figuring out which editors favour which agents. Editors wouldn’t want to upset anyone, so wouldn’t shout about who their favourites are. It’s not something to worry about too much though, as long as you are talking about reputable agents (see http://www.writerbeware.org for more on reputable…). It’s an agent’s job to know which editors are going to respond well to your book, whether or not there is any special favoured relationship – and even if they aren’t a favourite of one particular editor, they will be of another. And, yes, there are agents that I would classify as “least favourite” and would rather not buy a book from (no, I will NEVER say who!). It could be just a personality thing, or it could be the style of negotiating or submitting. But other editors would feel the complete opposite. There is enough diversity out there so that everyone is covered – or the agent wouldn’t last long! You just write a brilliant book, and the rest will take care of itself.

    "Just like it is a personal connection to your book, there are personal relationships between editors and agents that get on well or have similar tastes."


    We can't wait to have more of your questions next month! Sara would be happy to put questions to the marketing and sales team at Hot Key Books so would love to hear from published authors too. You can either submit your questions in the comments section below (anonymously if you prefer!) or you can email them to writers@britishscbwi.org.  Sara will return with all the answers on the 20th May.



    Sara O'Connor is the editorial director, print and digital at Hot Key Books, acquiring books like The Sunday Times Children's Book of the Week Shrunk! by Fleur Hitchcock, Tribute by Ellen Renner, Boonie by Richard Masson and Clockwise to Titan by Elon Dann. She looks for books that are brilliantly written, that stand out and that have lovely authors behind them, with a slight preference towards the 9-12 age category.

    She's also in charge of the digital strategy for Hot Key, working with a brilliant digital team to produce projects like the interactive iBook of Costa-award-winning Maggot Moon.

    My Blog List